Hu, Z. - Z., Huang, B., Kinter, J. L., Wu, Z., & Kumar, A. (2012). Connection of the stratospheric QBO with global atmospheric general circulation and tropical SST. Part II: interdecadal variations.
Clim Dyn, 38(1-2), 25–43.
Izaurralde, R. C., Rosenberg, N. J., Brown, R. A., Legler, D. M., Tiscareño López, M., & Srinivasan, R. (1999). Modeled effects of moderate and strong 'Los Niños' on crop productivity in North America.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 94(3-4), 259–268.
Jagtap, S. S., Jones, J. W., Hildebrand, P., Letson, D., O'Brien, J. J., Podestá, G., et al. (2002). Responding to stakeholder's demands for climate information: from research to applications in Florida.
Agricultural Systems, 74(3), 415–430.
Krishnamurthy, V., & Misra, V. (2010). Observed ENSO teleconnections with the South American monsoon system.
Atmos. Sci. Lett., .
Krishnamurthy, V., & Misra, V. (2011). Daily atmospheric variability in the South American monsoon system.
Clim Dyn, 37(3-4), 803–819.
Li, H., & Misra, V. (2014). Global seasonal climate predictability in a two tiered forecast system. Part II: boreal winter and spring seasons.
Clim Dyn, 42(5-6), 1449–1468.
McNaught, C. (2014).
The Increasing Intensity and Frequency of ENSO and its Impacts to the Southeast U.S. Bachelor's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Michael, J. - P. (2010).
ENSO Fidelity in Two Coupled Models. Master's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Abstract: This study examines the fidelity of the ENSO simulation in two coupled model integrations and compares this with available global ocean data assimilation. The two models are CAM-HYCOM coupled model developed by the HYCOM Consortium and CCSM3.0. The difference between the two climate models is in the use of different ocean general circulation model (OGCM). The hybrid isopycnal-sigma-pressure coordinate ocean model Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) replaces the ocean model Parallel Ocean Program (POP) of the CCSM3.0. In both, the atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) is used. In this way the coupled systems are compared in a controlled setting so that the effects of the OGCM may be obtained. Henceforth the two models will be referred to as CAM-HYCOM and CAM-POP respectively. Comparison of 200 years of model output is used discarding the first 100 years to account for spin-up issues. Both models (CAM-HYCOM and CAM-POP) are compared to observational data for duration, intensity, and global impacts of ENSO. Based on the analysis of equatorial SST, thermocline depth, wind stress and precipitation, ENSO in the CAM-HYCOM model is weaker and farther east than observations while CAM-POP is zonal and extends west of the international dateline. CAM-POP also has an erroneous biennial cycle of the equatorial pacific SSTs. The analysis of the subsurface ocean advective terms highlights the problems of the model simulations.
Michael, J. - P. (2014).
On Initializing CGCMs for Seasonal Predictability of ENSO. Ph.D. thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Michael, J. - P., Misra, V., & Chassignet, E. P. (2013). The El Niño and Southern Oscillation in the historical centennial integrations of the new generation of climate models.
Reg Environ Change, 13(S1), 121–130.