Sura, P., & Hannachi, A. (2015). Perspectives of Non-Gaussianity in Atmospheric Synoptic and Low-Frequency Variability.
J. Climate, 28(13), 5091–5114.
Tartaglione, C. A., Smith, S. R., & O'Brien, J. J. (2003). ENSO Impact on Hurricane Landfall Probabilities for the Caribbean.
J. Climate, 16(17), 2925–2931.
Verzone, K. V., Bourassa, M. A., Cocke, S. D., & LaRow, T. E. (2001). Double ensemble estimates of precipitation in the southeastern United States for extreme ENSO events. In
Symposium on Climate Variability, the Oceans and Societal Impacts (pp. 167–168).
Wang, H., Long, L., Kumar, A., Wang, W., Schemm, J. - K. E., Zhao, M., et al. (2014). How Well Do Global Climate Models Simulate the Variability of Atlantic Tropical Cyclones Associated with ENSO?
J. Climate, 27(15), 5673–5692.
Wei, J., Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., Zhang, L., & Misra, V. (2010). How Much Do Different Land Models Matter for Climate Simulation? Part I: Climatology and Variability.
J. Climate, 23(11), 3120–3134.
Wu, Z., Chassignet, E. P., Ji, F., & Huang, J. (2014). Reply to 'Spatiotemporal patterns of warming'.
Nature Climate change, 4(10), 846–848.
Wu, Z., Huang, N. E., Wallace, J. M., Smoliak, B. V., & Chen, X. (2011). On the time-varying trend in global-mean surface temperature.
Clim Dyn, 37(3-4), 759–773.
Xu, X., & Chassignet, E. P., Wang, F. (2018). On the variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation transports in coupled CMIP5 simulations.
Clim Dyn., 51(11), 6511–6531.
Abstract: The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) plays a fundamental role in the climate system, and long-term climate simulations are used to understand the AMOC variability and to assess its impact. This study examines the basic characteristics of the AMOC variability in 44 CMIP5 (Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project) simulations, using the 18 atmospherically-forced CORE-II (Phase 2 of the Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiment) simulations as a reference. The analysis shows that on interannual and decadal timescales, the AMOC variability in the CMIP5 exhibits a similar magnitude and meridional coherence as in the CORE-II simulations, indicating that the modeled atmospheric variability responsible for AMOC variability in the CMIP5 is in reasonable agreement with the CORE-II forcing. On multidecadal timescales, however, the AMOC variability is weaker by a factor of more than 2 and meridionally less coherent in the CMIP5 than in the CORE-II simulations. The CMIP5 simulations also exhibit a weaker long-term atmospheric variability in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). However, one cannot fully attribute the weaker AMOC variability to the weaker variability in NAO because, unlike the CORE-II simulations, the CMIP5 simulations do not exhibit a robust NAO-AMOC linkage. While the variability of the wintertime heat flux and mixed layer depth in the western subpolar North Atlantic is strongly linked to the AMOC variability, the NAO variability is not.
Xu, X., Rhines, P. B., & Chassignet, E. P. (2016). Temperature-Salinity Structure of the North Atlantic Circulation and Associated Heat and Freshwater Transports.
J. Climate, 29(21), 7723–7742.
Xue, W., Xin, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., Wu, H., Huang, Z., et al. (2016). Development and Testing of a Multi-model Ensemble Coupling Framework. In
Development and Evaluation of High Resolution Climate System Models (pp. 163–208). Springer.